Which outcome is likely from having a diverse set of IRB members?

Having a diverse set of IRB members is likely to lead to enhanced critical thinking and varied insights on research proposals. Diversity in an IRB brings together individuals with different backgrounds, experiences, and perspectives. This variety enables members to approach research proposals from multiple angles, allowing for a more comprehensive evaluation of ethical considerations, potential biases, and the implications of the research.

Diverse perspectives can lead to richer discussions, fostering an environment where different viewpoints are encouraged and considered. This ultimately strengthens the review process, as it helps identify potential ethical issues or concerns that might not have been addressed by a more homogenous group. The input from a diverse pool of members is invaluable in ensuring that research is ethical and respectful of all communities involved.

Other outcomes, such as disagreement on all proposed research studies or increased time for each proposal review, may occur but are not inherently the result of diversity and can be seen as potential challenges rather than positive outcomes. Meanwhile, diverse membership is more likely to promote inclusion rather than exclusion of certain demographics from studies, provided that the IRB is functioning effectively and ethically.