What type of review is required if a study involves identifiers and could impact participants' careers?

Convened Review is necessary in situations where a study involves identifiable information and has the potential to affect participants' careers. This type of review is conducted by a fully convened IRB board, which typically occurs when the research presents more than minimal risk to participants or when it involves vulnerable populations. The presence of identifiers increases the risks associated with confidentiality and privacy, as these factors can lead to potential harm if the information is disclosed or misused.

When studies could impact participants' careers, the consequences of a data breach or misuse of sensitive information are heightened, requiring a thorough review by the board. This ensures that appropriate safeguards are put in place to protect the participants and that the study adheres to ethical standards. The comprehensive scrutiny of a convened review process allows for more rigorous evaluation of the risks versus benefits involved in the research study.

In contrast, other types of reviews, such as Exempt Review and Expedited Review, are typically applied to studies presenting minimal risk or where participant information can be anonymized. Such reviews would not adequately address the heightened risks present in the scenario described.